Royal

Outrage Over Online Abuse Towards Meghan and Harry’s Daughter Sparks Calls for Child Protection

The relentless criticism and online abuse targeted at Lilibet Diana, the daughter of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, have sparked widespread condemnation from royal commentators and child welfare experts.

Since her birth in 2021, the two-year-old has been subjected to derogatory comments regarding her appearance and her parents’ parenting skills on various social media platforms.

In a recent column for The Telegraph, royal commentator Camilla Tominey strongly denounced the abuse, describing it as “beyond the pale” and stressing that it is high time for online bullies to cease their harmful behavior.

“While criticizing Meghan and Harry may be one thing, targeting their young daughter is utterly unacceptable,” Tominey emphasized. “Lilibet is a child who deserves protection from this kind of abusive treatment.”

Child welfare expert Dr. Ngozi Duru, the Centre for Child Protection director at the University of Roehampton, expressed deep concern over the abuse inflicted upon Lilibet.

“It is crucial to acknowledge that children are particularly vulnerable to online abuse,” Duru emphasized. “This form of mistreatment can severely impact a child’s mental health and overall well-being.”

Duru called for social media platforms to take more robust measures to safeguard children against abuse. Additionally, she urged parents to remain vigilant regarding their children’s online activities.

“We must do everything within our power to shield children from such abuse,” Duru insisted. “No child should endure such targeting.”

The criticism aimed at Lilibet comes within the context of a broader debate surrounding the British media’s treatment of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry.

Since their engagement announcement in 2017, the couple has faced a sustained campaign of negative coverage.

Meghan and Harry have distanced themselves from their royal duties in recent months and relocated to the United States.

They cited the need to protect their family from media intrusion as the primary reason for their decision.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button